In keeping with the foregoing paragraph, the contents of para No.two are admitted as correct. The match property was surely transferred in a very lawful way in the name of your predecessor-in-desire on the answering defendants. The contents of para No.1 of the plaint are vehemently denied. It's submitted that https://permanent-injection-lawye39628.blogsumer.com/31868807/the-best-side-of-cancellation-of-documents-lawyer-in-karachi